staging.messagenotes.org

Category: Important Notes II

Vairocana Is Faked By Satan/HIM/That Evil Snake – 1📌

I asked and GOD Michael commented that Vairocana is faked by Satan/HIM/That Evil Snake to deceive people and to make them believe there are many Gods similar to Amitabha. Unlike Guan Yin, there’s no beings being recognized as Vairocana by others in the Universe.

According to Wiki, Vairocana, also named Mahavairocana or “Great Sun Buddha”, literally means “from the sun” or “belonging to the sun”, “Solar” or “Shining”, is a Primordial Buddha from Vajrayana/Esoteric Buddhism.

There are many means of deception used around this fake Vairocana by Satan.

First, Satan/HIM/That evil snake forged the name Vairocana to substitute Amitabha’s name in order to establish its name in many sutras and to remove Amitabha\’s name. For example, one of the name substitutions in The Brahmajāla Sūtra is showed as below:

\”Now, I, Vairocana(originally Amitabha) Buddha, am sitting atop a lotus pedestal; On a thousand flowers surrounding me are a thousand Sakyamuni Buddhas. Each flower supports a hundred million worlds; in each world a Sakyamuni Buddha appears. All are seated beneath a Bodhi-tree, all simultaneously attain Buddhahood.\”

(Below picture on the left showed this graphically. )

$\"\"$
Vairocana in copper alloy, made in China during the Ming dynasty (1368–1644)

$\"\"$
A medieval Japanese painting of Vairocana

Only because some sutras got passed into China earlier and the buddhism system there was fragmented as well as paper was invented in China that\’s better for preserving many copies, Amitabha’s name remained in some sutras.

Once the name reverses back to Amitabha, Amitabha Buddha will be understood easily as the God.

May 28, 2025

May 28, 2025
Amitabha Is GOD Michael – 4 – Naga/Dragon Is Satan/HIM/That Evil Snake📌

I asked and GOD Michael confirmed that Naga/Dragon is Satan/HIM/That evil Snake. Naga is not a physical race living in the Indian area as legend depicts, neither do dragons ever have physical existence. These are Satan’s deceptive means.

According to various Asian traditions, especially in Indian, Tibetan and south Asian religious tradition, Naga, also known as dragons, is a race of serpent beings that resides in the underworld. It can take different forms as dragons that are most common in East Asian areas and Europe, as half-serpent, half-human forms in India or as common serpents form.

Below picture shows the dominant god-like position of Naga in Indian religious tradition.

$\"\"/$

Pillar with Naga Mucalinda protecting the throne of the Buddha. Railing pillar from Jagannath Tekri, Pauni (Bhandara District). 2nd-1st century BCE. National Museum of India.

In India and the surrounding area, the Buddha for local people in ancient times was mostly represented by an empty seat, some depicted like the picture above with Naga(Serpent being/Satan) dominating the seat ( picture of a pillar 200 BCE – 100 BCE.), others as below:

$\"\"/$

Below pictures show Satan/HIM/That evil Snake\’s deceptive forms in China and in Europe.

$\"\"/$
Dragons in China

Historically, dragon was a symbol of power and a protector of emperors in China. Only loyal palaces were allowed to be decorated with many dragons and only emperors were to sit on \”dragon seat\” and dress in \”dragon clothing\”(robes with dragons image depicting on it).

$\"\"/$
Dragon in Europe

Dragon has a bad name in Europe because Satan was known as a fallen Angel or Lucifer in \”War in Heaven\” Bible story but most people still don\’t know Satan/HIM/That evil Snake is a dragon.

May 25, 2025

May 25, 2025
Our Guardians Commented: The Compassionate Follower of Christ and the Compassionate Follower of Buddha Meet in the Middle Where Love and Wisdom are Balanced☀️📌

Sharing a Q\’uo Channeling script on April 2, 2011 that our Guardians shared insightful information to confirm about Christianity and Buddhism and that either path of following Christ or following the Buddha is sound and useful.

\”The teachings of the one known as Jesus appeal to those who enjoy the feeling of an open heart, a heart open to love. The teachings of the one known as Siddhartha appeal to those who seek wisdom. Yet, the compassionate follower of Christ and the compassionate follower of Buddha meet in the middle where love and wisdom are balanced. Consequently, either path is sound and useful.

……

Both the Christ and the Buddha vibrate at a certain energy. It is a similar energy. The heart of following either entity is to avail yourself of this vibration. As you avail yourself of this vibration, you become that which you are seeking to learn. And as you gradually are able to allow this understanding, shall we say, to penetrate into the very depths and roots of your mind and consciousness, you will be able to avoid the distortion that is rampant. \”

May 21, 2025

——–

Q\’uo Channeling script on April 2, 2011

Jim: The question this evening is from T in Taiwan. “Q’uo, please tell us something about the seeking and the enlightenment of Gautama Siddhartha, aka, the Buddha. What does this story tell us about spiritual enlightenment?

(Carla channeling)

Q’uo: We are those known to you as the principle of Q’uo. We greet you in the love and in the light of the one infinite Creator, in whose service we attend this circle of seeking this evening. We wish to thank each of you for calling us to your group and for taking the time out of your lives to seek the truth in this manner. You help us greatly as we have offered our service to do just that, speak with those who ask on the questions they designate.

As always, before we begin we would ask each [of you] to use your discernment in listening to what we have to say, taking those things which are helpful from our thoughts and leaving the rest behind. We appreciate your doing this as it will ease our minds to know that we do not need to be concerned about infringing on your free will. Thank you for this consideration.

The query this evening has to do with the one known as Siddhartha, or the Buddha, and what he has to teach about spiritual enlightenment. We find in order to approach this in a way which may be more helpful, we would take some time to speak about the two strains of religious thought that are encapsulated in the teachings of the one known as Jesus the Christ and the one known as the Buddha.

Both entities, Jesus and Siddhartha, offer tremendous resources to those who are seeking the truth. They have different areas of appeal but that which they hold in common is powerful. To them both the seeking of the Creator, service to the Creator, time spent in the company of the Creator are all in all. To both, there is no priority greater than spiritual seeking. Both of them lived lives that indicated this preference, this concern, and this devotion.

There are two different styles of seeking when gazing at these two powerful and poignant beings. To one, knowing that his kingdom was not of this world, he nevertheless entered into the world with all of his heart and soul and nothing in his heart but love for all he saw. As he entered in, so his physical body was destroyed by that which he took upon himself: the suffering of the world. All suffering was taken into the self and accepted. That it destroyed his physical body was not that which was important to the one known as Jesus the Christ, but rather that he did his father’s bidding. “Not my will, but thine,” were his words.

The Buddha saw the same world and knew that he was not of it or part of it. Consequently, his path did not move into the open heart and take all of the suffering of the world into the self. Rather, he allowed the things of the world to fall away as they seemed to want to fall away in his view. Over the period of a lifetime he was able to investigate each path in the world and conclude that that was not his path. The principle of “neti-neti, not this and not that” 1 comes into play here. Thusly, as the Buddha allowed all to fall away except the seeking for the one Creator, the entity no longer was concerned with the suffering of the world except to pray that all suffering might cease. There was not the attempt to take on the suffering of the world; rather, the attempt was to allow the suffering of the one known as the Buddha to fall away and as suffering fell away from the Buddha, so it would fall away from the world.

The teachings of the one known as Jesus appeal to those who enjoy the feeling of an open heart, a heart open to love. The teachings of the one known as Siddhartha appeal to those who seek wisdom. Yet, the compassionate follower of Christ and the compassionate follower of Buddha meet in the middle where love and wisdom are balanced. Consequently, either path is sound and useful. And we might suggest to those who are Buddhist or Hindu and have followed the path of the Buddha for their lifetime that they investigate what it is to follow the teachings of the one known as Jesus. It is equally useful for those who have followed the teachings of Jesus over the period of their lifetime to investigate and enter into the teachings of the one known as Siddhartha.

Remember that it is not to the extreme that awareness comes, but to the one who has been able to balance the energies of love and the energies of wisdom. The lifetime of the one known as Siddhartha was one in which the wealthy man became poor, the active man became quiet, the leader of armies retired from the lists and developed the habits of sitting in meditation and ferrying people across a river. Humble and modest, the Buddha was not led by intellect but by his hunger and his thirst for the presence of the infinite One.

There is no better exemplar of the truth than one entity who has achieved spiritual maturity. Such a person is capable of leading others to their own discoveries by association. We could say it was done by inspiration yet that would indicate that thought was taken to inspire and this is not so of the one known as Siddhartha. Yet his very presence became eloquent and has lighted and inspired those who follow his teachings for many, many centuries.

It is almost impossible to use words to create in others awareness, sensitivity to spirit, or inspiration. It is not impossible but it is very difficult to use words to move people’s hearts and minds in a way that is lasting. The one known as Jesus worked upon this point by telling stories. The one known as the Buddha acknowledged this point with his silence. And in that silence stands the spiritually mature Buddha, that one who, just as you, had been full of desires, interested in wealth, influence and power. There was not distaste but simply a preference for not dealing with these.

Why, my friends, would one not wish to take up the reins of government, military, economic leadership and so forth? The one known as Siddhartha saw no attraction, no reason to stay within that prison of concepts, ideology and the clash of wills that represents the government, the military, and the halls of power. This simple turning away, this freeing of the self from the prison of things, stands as a beacon, letting others know that it is possible to free the self of the burden of the love of things. It is a powerful lesson indeed.

It is not that the one known as Buddha scorned money but that the one known as Siddhartha was not imprisoned by attaching himself to a desire for it. Where there was no desire, there was no longer a use for that catalyst and with his whole heart and mind, the one known as Gautama gently and firmly said “not this” to each thing he encountered in the world.

It is a very helpful concept to separate the things of the world from attachment to things of the world. The Buddha did not have to preach the evils of the things of the world. He simply did not desire them. To an entity swamped in desires, some of them conflicting, this freedom is precious and the way of the Buddha very, very helpful.

It is sometimes very difficult to separate entities such as Jesus the Christ, or Siddhartha the Buddha, from the institutions and cultural expectations that have grown up about these entities after their deaths. They have no control over what happens. They are no longer of this density. And those of this density, intent upon influence and power, have systematically attempted to alter the mystical teachings of these two leaders to approximate something that can make money and be sustainable. Therefore, if you wish to follow either entity, it is well to look for the source of teachings, to look for that which has been offered by these great teachers, rather than listening to the rhetoric of those who supposedly follow these teachers.

To follow either of these two men is very difficult because of the confusion that has arisen over centuries of distortion. Yet it is entirely possible to win through to a relatively undistorted grasp of that which is offered by the one known as the Buddha. An entity needing to look more closely at the Buddha just as an entity needing to look more closely at the one known as Jesus, the Christ, needs to do a continuing and daily amount of inner work to support the attempt and we recommend whatever form of entering the silence would be helpful to you in order to support the realizations that you are attempting to seat within your consciousness.

Both the Christ and the Buddha vibrate at a certain energy. It is a similar energy. The heart of following either entity is to avail yourself of this vibration. As you avail yourself of this vibration, you become that which you are seeking to learn. And as you gradually are able to allow this understanding, shall we say, to penetrate into the very depths and roots of your mind and consciousness, you will be able to avoid the distortion that is rampant.

At this time we would ask if there is a follow-up to this query among those in this circle. We are those of Q’uo.

Source from: https://www.llresearch.org/channeling/2011/0402

May 21, 2025
Amitabha Is GOD Michael – 3 – Satan/HIM/That Evil Snake Removed The One Buddha/One God Concept From Buddhism📌

I asked and GOD Micheal confirmed that Satan/That evil Snake influenced the buddhism development in ancient time and removed or substituted Amitabha\’s name with Vairocana’s name in sutras (more detail in later post). Furthermore, Satan misled people to show Shakyamuni Buddha in a triad to remove Amitabha’s name especially in the origination country India, so as to remove the one God concept.

In East Asian Buddhism, mainly the Pure Land School of the Mahayana Buddhism, Amitābha is most often depicted as part of a triad with the two bodhisattvas Avalokiteśvara (Compassion) and Mahāsthāmaprāpta (Wisdom), representing the core of the Pure Land tradition.

Only in Amitabha (the God) level, would he be accompanied by these other two important bodhisattvas, one representing compassion and the other representing wisdom. That means many statues of Shakyamuni Buddha in a triad such as these in below were mistaken or a distortion of the one God concept influenced by Satan/that evil snake.

$\"\"/$

Shakyamuni Buddha statue in front of the wall of the great stupa at Sanchi. (The whole background setting mimicked Amitabha\’s )

$\"\"/$

Shakyamuni Buddha statue in front of his stupa; (his face was also made to mimic Amitabha)

According to my research, Mahayana Buddhism was popular from around 100 BC to 300 AD then subsequently declined and was replaced by Hinduism in India. Similar to Christian, Buddhists were being persecuted by kings influenced by Satan/HIM several times. The one Buddha/God concept was being replaced with many Buddhas/Gods concepts, especially in Theravāda Buddhism and Vajrayāna Buddhism.

Chinese Buddhism, which got the early Mahayana Buddhism sutras passed into the country, doesn’t have the concept of worshiping Shakyamuni Buddha in its culture. If you ask an ordinary Chinese person who they think the Buddha in their temple is, they will let you know he is Amitabha Buddha or the Buddha. Most temples inside China indeed only put up Amitabha or Amitabha in a triad. If you asked if Shakyamuni Buddha could be put above Avalokiteśvara (Guan Yin, in Chinese: 观音) in a triad, they would think it’s a wrong setting as Avalokiteśvara(Guan Yin) was a higher level buddha in their concept. All the monks in Chinese temples only greet others by saying \”Namo Amitofuo\” to pay homage to Amitabha. So by default, the Buddha in Chinese Buddhism meant Amitabha, which means Amitabha was the Buddha/the God in the original Buddhism.

In summary, Satan/HIM/That evil snake not only twisted Buddhism sutras, suppressed and persecuted Buddhists but also distorted the Buddha image/statues.

May 18, 2025

May 18, 2025
Amitabha Is GOD Michael – 2 – Shakyamuni Buddha Doesn\’t Look Like Amitabha📌

Many people don\’t know how Shakyamuni Buddha looked, so I asked whether Shakyamuni Buddha looked like Amitabha. GOD Michael commented that Shakyamuni Buddha looked like a typical Indian person and didn’t look like Amitabha.

I did some research online and found that Shakyamuni Buddha was born around 500 – 600 BCE in Nepal or north east India and his family members were all Indians.

Shakyamuni Buddha didn’t have an image until around the 100 BCE about the time Mahayana Buddhism first appeared. I asked and GOD Michael confirmed that people got visions about Amitabha and were later sometimes mixed or mistaken as Shakyamuni’s.

Below picture is from Sanchi Stupa 1 Eastern Gateway, which is built around 3rd century BCE. In the middle of the panel, those who sitting on elephants or horses were Siddhartha Gautama’s family members. The child in the middle of the panel may either be Siddhartha Gautama himself or his brother. This picture clearly shows Siddhartha Gautama’s family is a typical Indian family.

$\"\"/$
Procession of king Suddhodana from Kapilavastu( Siddhartha Gautama’s father), proceeding to meet his son the Buddha walking in mid-air, and to give him a Banyan tree (bottom left corner). Sanchi Stupa 1 Eastern Gateway.

Some early Buddha statues showed Shakyamuni Buddha’s image:

$\"\"/$
A Seated Buddha statue (Gupta temple)Gupta Period remains; Built from the mid 3rd century to mid 6th century CE.

May 15, 2025

May 15, 2025
Amitabha Is GOD Michael – 2 – Shakyamuni Buddha Doesn\’t Look Like Amitabha📌

Many people don\’t know how Shakyamuni Buddha looked, so I asked whether Shakyamuni Buddha looked like Amitabha. GOD Michael commented that Shakyamuni Buddha looked like a typical Indian person and didn’t look like Amitabha.

I did some research online and found that Shakyamuni Buddha was born around 500 – 600 BCE in Nepal or north east India and his family members were all Indians.

Shakyamuni Buddha didn’t have an image until around the 100 BCE about the time Mahayana Buddhism first appeared. I asked and GOD Michael confirmed that people got visions about Amitabha and were later sometimes mixed or mistaken as Shakyamuni’s.

Below picture is from Sanchi Stupa 1 Eastern Gateway, which is built around 3rd century BCE. In the middle of the panel, those who sitting on elephants or horses were Siddhartha Gautama’s family members. The child in the middle of the panel may either be Siddhartha Gautama himself or his brother. This picture clearly shows Siddhartha Gautama’s family is a typical Indian family.

$\"\"/$
Procession of king Suddhodana from Kapilavastu( Siddhartha Gautama’s father), proceeding to meet his son the Buddha walking in mid-air, and to give him a Banyan tree (bottom left corner). Sanchi Stupa 1 Eastern Gateway.

Some early Buddha statues showed Shakyamuni Buddha’s image:

$\"\"/$
A Seated Buddha statue (Gupta temple)Gupta Period remains; Built from the mid 3rd century to mid 6th century CE.

May 15, 2025

May 15, 2025
The 2nd Density Beings In Our Environment Encouraging Us To Fight Against Satan/HIM/That Evil Snake☀️🌸🦜

This spring there are more flowers, birds, bees, butterflies and different flower trees coming out to make our environment better than before. I asked and GOD Michael commented that the second density beings had free will and some good changes are the result of their fighting with Satan/HIM/That Evil Snake. It’s also their free will coming out to encourage us to fight.

$\"\"$

$\"\"$

$\"\"$

$\"\"$

$\"\"$

$\"\"$

$\"\"$

$\"\"$

Flowers greeting

Flowers greeting

You can also visit youtube channel for this website: https://www.youtube.com/@MessageNotes-BlueBird

May 12, 2025

May 12, 2025
Amitabha Is GOD Michael – 1☀️📌

I asked and GOD Michael confirmed that Shakyamuni Buddha (Siddhartha Gautama, in Chinese: 释迦牟尼) was in contact with him.

Amitabha (in Chinese: 阿弥陀佛 or 无量光佛) mentioned in Pure Land Sutras referred to GOD Michael. Amitabha is one of the main Tathagata worshipped by Buddhists from Mahayana Buddhism which is one of the major branches of Buddhism. (Shakyamuni Buddha in Buddhism is similar to Jesus Christ in Christian.)Satan/HIM removed the teaching of the Buddha/the God from Buddha’s teaching, so that Buddhists mostly only have many Gods concepts.

Chinese Buddhism(汉传佛教) was less influenced by Satan/HIM because of historical reasons that the Buddhism sutra Sanskrit passed into Ancient China earlier with limited times about 2000 years ago. Also Chinese Buddhism developed its own understanding and religious system that’s quite fragmented to be influenced by Satan/HIM easily.

The name Amitabha, also known as Amitābha in Sanskrit, literally means infinite light. Amitābha\’s light is said to radiate throughout the cosmos and shine on all beings. There are two translations in Chinese too, one is by its sound as “阿弥陀佛” and the other is by its meaning “无量光佛”- “Infinite Light Buddha” , which shows clearly it’s what we understand as the Buddha or the God in western culture.

Buddhists/monks in China use \”Namo Amitofuo\” (南无阿弥陀佛) as a greeting or mantra all the time. “Namo” means to turn back, to take refuge, to return and rely, to pay homage. “Amituo” means infinite, “Amituofo” means infinite and awakening buddha. As a greeting, our Guardians commented it\’s the same as what they say “I greet you in the love and in the light of the one infinite Creator”.

I found some pictures of Amitabha from ancient times and they all showed similarity in the image of St. Michael (GOD Michael) of western culture.

$\"\"$

$\"\"$
Sculpture depicting “Amitabha preaching in Sukhavati heaven,” 2nd century AD, from the site of Muhammad Nari in the erstwhile North-West Frontier Province, British India (present-day Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan) and currently housed and pictured in this image at the Government Museum and Art Gallery in Chandigarh, India. Source from wikipedia.

Below are Amitabha statues from Yungang Grottoes (云冈石窟), located near Datong (大同) in Shanxi (山西) province, is another one of China’s most magnificent Buddhist stone carings. The whole grottoes was dedicated to worship Amitabha. Carved into the cliffs of the Wuzhou Mountain (武周山), this UNESCO World Heritage Site features Amitabha stone carvings that date back over 1,500 years to the Northern Wei Dynasty (北魏, 386–534 AD), a Dynasty earlier than Tang Dynasty.

$\"\"$

$\"\"$

———-

A Side Note: Previously, I have confirmed that adding GOD Michael is a good practice for buddhists. At that time I had very limited knowledge about buddhism and in my impression, there are many Gods but don’t have the God, so I didn’t ask deeper questions than that. ( A lot of time, the information I got depending on my knowledge in the area and the questions I asked. )

May 9, 2025

May 9, 2025
Who Is Yahweh? – Satan/HIM Often Deceived Humans As Yahweh – 2📌

Below is a channeling script on Apr 27, 2024 in which our Guardians commented about Yahweh. It shows that the original Yahweh was replaced and the transmission began being sent by a non-loving negative being. (Satan/HIM).

Our Guardians further commented that Satan/HIM influenced the people in power on Earth to harm Earth people with religious sanction and much distortion on knowledge about polarity, incarnation and the universe. As a consequence, lots of people stay in a neutral zone till this day (didn\’t choose a polarity and work on it) and will have to go back to primitive society to repeat the big cycle of 75,000 years. ( See post: This Is Likely The Last lifetime You Can Right Your Record Before The 4th Density Upgrade)

Q’uo/Our Guardians Channeling Script On Apr 27, 2024

A: I have a question. I recently read the Bible and I’m trying to put this in the most positive way possible, but some of the things I read in the Old Testament like, I don’t know, like, I want to say, like, hurt me emotionally. It’s the things that, the, I guess you could call him the God of Israel, which we know as we know their name, the name is supposedly like Yahweh or Jehovah, or like both, or they might be different people. I just don’t know. I just don’t understand. And I just, I want to make sense of some of the things that happened in that book, and I want to know, like, who is Yahweh, and who is Jehovah?

Q’uo: We are those of Q’uo and receive your query with empathy for the pain you experience in reaction to that which your people know as a Holy Scripture, my brother. Regarding the who is who of this particular character, as you have identified it, as the one known as Yahweh within the Old Testament.

Your studies, my brother, may benefit from a reading of that recorded transmission that is known to you as The Law of One, for this specific subject was addressed at some length in terms of the history of this higher density social memory complex (the original Yahweh) who had identified itself as Yahweh in service to those of your planet and who, through a detuned people, was replaced; shall we say—that is to say, the transmission began being sent not from the original loving source, but from a non-loving source [by a being of a] negative nature.(by Satan/HIM ) Thus, adding yet new layers of confusion to that which was already endemic in your world.

The emotional experience that you undergo while reading these words highlights where there is work for you to do, our brother. And it is work well undertaken. As we spoke in our previous response, it is by no accident that you are having this intersection with this material at this moment. It is, you might say, good grist for your mill.

How you shall make use of that is not for us to say, but for you to discover. But it may, in reflection, offer [an] opportunity for your healing. For there is, indeed, from the third-density perspective, difficult material, within that particular text, of entities harming other entities with religious sanction and much confusion about the nature of polarity and of the journey and the universe itself.(Here our Guardians commented that it referred to Satan/HIM influencing the entities in power on Earth to harm Earth people with religious sanction and much distortion on knowledge about polarity, incarnation and the universe. As a consequence, lots of people stay in a neutral zone till this day (didn\’t choose a polarity and work on it) and will have to go back to primitive society to repeat the big cycle of 75,000 years. )

And [it] has continued to offer your people a catalyst both of inspiration and separation in various measures. We find, as we have spoken before, that your holy works, on the whole, tend to offer this sort of mixed orientation. But for the seeker who comes into a knowing of him or herself, in the deeper sense of that knowing, who finds that peace within and knows who they are in both a polarized and a non-polarized sense—but especially for its relevance to the third density entity, the polarized sense, as one who is committed to the path of serving others—even text which seems so inherently troubling can be interpreted such that it offers important points of philosophical consideration for the self.

Is there a follow up to this query, my brother?

A: I just want to say thank you.

J: Can I ask a follow up in relation to that? Recently, if I recall correctly, there was grilling in congress, where a congressman was asking, in terms of “Do you believe in the God of Israel?”, per se, and what I’m hearing is today, and I need to study more in this area, but that may be the quote/unquote, “God of Israel” may be a higher social memory complex, but not truly the source, per se, that we are all a part of. Is that, am I hearing that correctly? Or can you clarify that?

Q’uo: We are Q’uo, and we thank you for your query, my brother. We would clarify that, indeed, there were higher-density interactions, in, from your perspective, the days of old [with] those of that tribe known to you as Israel. And such interactions were recorded in various states of distortion in those books which you reference now. And depending upon one’s orientation when approaching that question, such as you asked, such as was being asked, will point to the particular source of that inspiration and/or information to those of that time, and that place.

There is no one answer to that question, for it is possible to look to such text, as we referred previously, and draw from it negative lessons; and to look to that text, and to whatever extent it records it faithfully, its external seeming source, and find positive inspiration; and even greater opportunity for mixed types of inspiration.

May we ask if there is a follow-up to this query? We are those of Q’uo.

J: So, generally, maybe we can assume that negative energy features in the Old Testament, for example, are distortions that occurred at one level or the other?

Q’uo: We are those of Q’uo, and in the sense that we believe you intend the phrase “are distortions of one level or another,” we would confirm this supposition that the original project began as a purely positively oriented source and, through the free will of your peoples of that region, distortions were indeed rendered to the original mission and original nature of the material.

However, that was not the end of the story. And as we had suggested previously, one may benefit from a study of our previous transmission, that is from one of our group known to you as The Law of One, which may offer greater clarity in terms of the ability of the, what you might see as, original Yahweh to not to lose context completely.

J: Thank you so much.

Q’uo: We thank you, my brother. Before we transfer this contact to the one known as Jim, we would ask if there is another query from this circle? We are those of Q’uo.

Source: https://www.llresearch.org/channeling/2024/0427

May 3, 2025

May 3, 2025
Jesus’ Commandment: Love One Another, Was Intended To Replace The Ten Commandments📌

The origin of the Ten Commandments is somewhat complex.

Our guardian Ra had given some detailed information back in 1981 about its origin in The Law of One, Book I, Session 16, which shows clearly: firstly the original Yahweh was not the source of the Ten Commandments; secondly, HE was not the God people think HE was (Yahweh). Third, the real God didn’t give the Ten Commandments.

GOD Michael commented that HE/Satan also twisted this legend to make people believe HE was the one(Yahweh) giving the Ten Commandments. Actually the tribes at that time were in contact with both positive and negative races.

It’s written in the book of John that Jesus taught a new commandment: Love one another, with the intention to replace the Ten Commandments. This further showed that the Father Jesus talked about was different than the existing God(Yahweh/HIM) at that time.

—–

The Law of One, Book I, Session 16 January 31, 1981

Questioner: Can you tell me the origin of the Ten Commandments?

Ra: I am Ra. The origin of these commandments follows the law of negative entities impressing information upon positively oriented mind/body/spirit complexes. The information attempted to copy or ape positivity while retaining negative characteristics.

Questioner: Was this done by the Orion group? (A negative group in the Universe)

Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.

Questioner: What was their purpose in doing this?

Ra: I am Ra. The purpose of the Orion group, as mentioned before, is conquest and enslavement. This is done by finding and establishing an elite and causing others to serve the elite through various devices such as the laws you mentioned and others given by this entity.

Questioner: Was the recipient of the commandments positively or negatively oriented?

Ra: I am Ra. The recipient was one of extreme positivity, thus accounting for some of the pseudo-positive characteristics of the information received. As with contacts which are not successful, this entity, vibratory complex, Moishe(Moses), did not remain a credible influence among those who had first heard the philosophy of One and this entity(Moses) was removed from this third-density vibratory level in a lessened or saddened state, having lost, what you may call, the honor and faith with which he had begun the conceptualization of the Law of One and the freeing of those who were of his tribes, as they were called at that time/space.

Questioner: If this entity(Moses) was positively oriented, how was the Orion group able to contact him?

Ra: I am Ra. This was an intensive, shall we say, battleground between positively oriented forces of Confederation origin and negatively oriented sources. The one called Moishe(Moses) was open to impressions and received the Law of One in its most simple form. However, the information became negatively oriented due to his people’s pressure to do specific physical things in the third-density planes. This left the entity open for the type of information and philosophy of a self-service nature.

———

Book of John

(Session) Abraham’s Children and the Devil’s (Satan’s) Children

8:40 Jesus replied, “If you are Abraham’s children, you would be doing the deeds of Abraham. 8:40 But now you are trying to kill me, a man who has told you the truth I heard from God. Abraham did not do this! 8:41 You people are doing the deeds of your father.(Satan/HIM)”

Then they said to Jesus, “We were not born as a result of immortality! We have only one Father, God himself.” 8:41 Jesus replied, “If God were your Father, you would love me, for I have come from God and am now here. I have not come on my own initiative, but he sent me. 8:43 Why don’t you understand what I am saying? It is because you cannot accept my teaching. 8:44 You people are from your father the devil (Satan/HIM), and you want to do what your father desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not uphold the truth, because there is no truth in him. Whenever he lies, he speaks according to his own nature, because he is a liar and the father of lies. 8:45 But because I am telling you the truth, you do not believe me. 8:46 Who among you can prove me guilty of any sin? If I am telling you the truth, why don’t you believe me? 8:47 The one who belongs to God listens and responds to God’s words. You don’t listen and respond, because you don’t belong to God.”

13:34 “I give you a new commandment – to love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also are to love one another. 13:35 Everyone will know by this that you are my disciples – if you have love for one another.”

15:9 “Just as the Father has loved me, I have also loved you; remain in my love. 15:10 If you obey my commandments, you will remain in my love, just as I have obeyed my Father’s commandments and remain in his love. 15:11 I have told you these things so that my joy may be in you, and your joy may be complete. 15:1 My commandment is this – to love one another just as I have loved you.

——–

A Side Note: Love is the main lesson for the positive oriented path in the 3rd density, whereas power and control are the main lessons for the negative oriented path. The Ten Commandments and the way it\’s given showed its negative influence in stressing power and control.

May 1, 2025

May 1, 2025